| Anquan Hebert, Defensive End | ULM |
Current/Potential | SACK | STUFF | TAK | HUR | DP |
54/62 | | | | | | Louisiana-Monroe Indians |
|
Attributes |
Morale: | Content |
Height: | 6-0 |
Weight: | 282 |
Ideal Wt: | 283 |
Jersey: | 97 |
Age: | 24 |
Year: | () |
Status: | OK |
Energy: | 0 |
HS Ranking: | #1629 |
Pos Ranking: | #101 DE |
|
Position Ratings |
Pass Rush Moves: | 55 |
Point of Attack: | 61 |
Hands: | 46 |
Tackling: | 49 |
Coverage: | 34 |
Durability: | 70 |
Endurance: | 63 |
Adaptability: | 86 |
|
Athletic Ratings |
Arm Strength: | 13 |
Acceleration: | 41 |
Agility: | 36 |
Speed: | 48 |
Strength: | 51 |
Jumping: | 61 |
Instincts: | 54 |
Aggressiveness: | 46 |
Discipline: | 99 |
Intelligence: | 55 |
Work Ethic: | 77 |
|
Personal Bests |
Sacks: | 1 |
| |
Stuffs: | 1 |
| |
Tackles: | 3 |
| |
Hurries: | 2 |
| |
Interceptions: | 1 |
| |
|
Game Logs |
Week | Opp | Res | Tak | Solo | Ast | Sack | Stuf | Hur | DP | FF | PD | Int | TD | MT | OOP |
|
Defensive Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Tak | Solo | Ast | Sack | Stuf | Hur | DP | FF | PD | MT | OOP | BPA | |
2049 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | - |
2050 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | - |
2051 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Total | 23 | 15 | 18 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 14 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | - |
|
Turnover Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Ints | Yds | Avg | RecF | Yds | Avg | TD | | | | | | |
2048 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
2049 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 2 | 0.7 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
2050 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total | 23 | 15 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 4 | 8 | 2.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Scouting Report | Potential |
| His ability to rush the passer probably won't ever be better than average. With a little more polish, his run defense can reach an acceptable level. Coaches anticipate that he will become an adequate tackler. He'll continue to improve his strength until he can hold his own against most offensive linemen. |
|
|