| Jerald Barnard, Outside Linebacker | IDHO |
Current/Potential | TAK | SACK | STUFF | INT | TD |
55/63 | | | | | | Idaho Vandals |
|
Attributes |
Morale: | Content |
Height: | 6-0 |
Weight: | 245 |
Ideal Wt: | 247 |
Jersey: | 52 |
Age: | 24 |
Year: | |
Status: | OK |
Energy: | 0 |
HS Ranking: | #1503 |
Pos Ranking: | #125 OLB |
|
Position Ratings |
Pass Rush Moves: | 49 |
Point of Attack: | 50 |
Hands: | 46 |
Tackling: | 61 |
Coverage: | 57 |
Punt Return: | 7 |
Kick Return: | 8 |
Durability: | 65 |
Endurance: | 68 |
Adaptability: | 67 |
|
Athletic Ratings |
Arm Strength: | 2 |
Acceleration: | 44 |
Agility: | 43 |
Speed: | 48 |
Strength: | 52 |
Jumping: | 51 |
Instincts: | 54 |
Aggressiveness: | 51 |
Discipline: | 85 |
Intelligence: | 60 |
Work Ethic: | 69 |
|
Personal Bests |
Tackles: | 5 |
| |
Sacks: | 1 |
| |
Stuffs: | 1 |
| |
Interceptions: | 0 |
| |
TD: | 0 |
| |
|
Game Logs |
Week | Opp | Res | Tak | Solo | Ast | Sack | Stuf | Hur | DP | FF | PD | Int | TD | MT | OOP |
|
Defensive Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Tak | Solo | Ast | Sack | Stuf | Hur | DP | FF | PD | MT | OOP | BPA | |
2049 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
2050 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | - |
2051 | 8 | 4 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | - |
Total | 13 | 4 | 19 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | - |
|
Turnover Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Ints | Yds | Avg | RecF | Yds | Avg | TD | | | | | | |
2050 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 25 | 25.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 25 | 25.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Scouting Report | Potential |
| He works out with a ferocity that should ensure that he will turn into one of the strongest linebackers in the nation. He's focused on being more aggressive and, when that happens, his production will rise. He's got the natural mobility necessary to eventually become pretty good in pass coverage. With a little more time, his instincts will put him in position to make plays that many others wouldn't get to. |
|
|