| Nic Pickens, Quarterback | CUSE |
Current/Potential | RATING | YARDS | COMP% | TD | INT |
54/64 | | | | | | Syracuse Orange |
|
Attributes |
Morale: | Content |
Height: | 6-2 |
Weight: | 203 |
Ideal Wt: | 206 |
Jersey: | 13 |
Age: | 22 |
Year: | (Jr) |
Status: | OK |
Energy: | 0 |
HS Ranking: | #756 |
Pos Ranking: | #38 QB |
|
Position Ratings |
Passing Accuracy: | 57 |
Passing Touch: | 66 |
Running: | 56 |
Hands: | 53 |
Punt Return: | 9 |
Kick Return: | 8 |
Durability: | 54 |
Endurance: | 34 |
Adaptability: | 100 |
|
Athletic Ratings |
Arm Strength: | 37 |
Acceleration: | 64 |
Agility: | 38 |
Speed: | 52 |
Strength: | 47 |
Jumping: | 56 |
Instincts: | 62 |
Aggressiveness: | 43 |
Discipline: | 88 |
Intelligence: | 51 |
Work Ethic: | 64 |
|
Personal Bests |
Attempts: | 18 |
| |
Completions: | 9 |
| |
Passing yards: | 175 |
| |
Longest pass: | 54 |
| |
Touchdowns: | 1 |
| |
|
Game Logs |
Week | Opp | Res | Att | Comp | Comp% | Yds | Yds/A | TD | Int | Lng | Sack | Rat | R Yds | YPC | R TDs |
|
Passing Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Comp-Att | Comp% | Yds | Yds/A | TD | TD% | Int | Int% | Lng | GP | BP | Sack | Rat |
2050 | 4 | 1 | 13-18 | 72.2 | 234 | 13.0 | 2 | 11.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 54 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 218.1 |
2051 | 7 | 1 | 18-51 | 35.3 | 238 | 4.7 | 1 | 2.0 | 2 | 3.9 | 41 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 73.1 |
Total | 11 | 2 | 31-69 | 44.9 | 472 | 6.8 | 3 | 4.3 | 2 | 2.9 | 54 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 110.9 |
|
Rushing Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Rush | Yds | YPG | YPC | Lng | TD | CR | MH | Fum | FLost | Sack | YL | |
2050 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | - |
2051 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 31 | 4.4 | 6.2 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | - |
Total | 11 | 2 | 6 | 31 | 2.8 | 5.2 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 13 | - |
|
Scouting Report | Potential |
| Most people feel that he will become a fairly accurate passer over time. The touch passing part of his game will eventually be above average. Won't ever have more than average arm strength. Hopefully, that will be enough. His scrambling ability will continue to evolve, which is very bad news for the defenses. |
|
|