 | Michael Brandt, Running Back | TAMU |
| Current/Potential | RUSH Y | YPC | LNG | REC Y | TD |
| 67/69 | | | | | | Texas A&M Aggies |
|
| Attributes |
| Morale: | Content |
| Height: | 5-11 |
| Weight: | 247 |
| Ideal Wt: | 250 |
| Jersey: | 33 |
| Age: | 23 |
| Year: | Sr |
| Status: | OK |
| Energy: | 0 |
| HS Ranking: | #475 |
| Pos Ranking: | #41 RB |
|
| Position Ratings |
| Running: | 82 |
| Hands: | 58 |
| Route Running: | 38 |
| Run Block: | 58 |
| Punt Return: | 4 |
| Kick Return: | 47 |
| Durability: | 61 |
| Endurance: | 47 |
| Adaptability: | 85 |
|
| Athletic Ratings |
| Arm Strength: | 5 |
| Acceleration: | 49 |
| Agility: | 63 |
| Speed: | 50 |
| Strength: | 54 |
| Jumping: | 55 |
| Instincts: | 44 |
| Aggressiveness: | 40 |
| Discipline: | 90 |
| Intelligence: | 78 |
| Work Ethic: | 60 |
|
| Personal Bests |
| Rushes: | 24 |
| |
| Rushing yards: | 166 |
| |
| Longest run: | 48 |
| |
| Receiving yards: | 45 |
| |
| Touchdowns: | 2 |
| |
|
| Game Logs |
| Week | Opp | Res | Rush | Yds | YPC | YPG | Lng | TD | CR | MH | FLost | Rec | Yds | YPC | TD |
|
| Rushing Statistics |
| Year | GP | GS | Rush | Yds | YPG | YPC | Lng | TD | CR | MH | Fum | FLost | | | |
| 2049 | 7 | 3 | 92 | 432 | 61.7 | 4.7 | 27 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | - | - | - |
| 2050 | 10 | 6 | 177 | 745 | 74.5 | 4.2 | 38 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | - | - | - |
| 2051 | 12 | 12 | 182 | 804 | 67.0 | 4.4 | 48 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | - | - | - |
| Total | 29 | 21 | 451 | 1981 | 68.3 | 4.4 | 48 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 2 | - | - | - |
|
| Receiving Statistics |
| Year | GP | GS | Att | Rec | Yds | YPG | YPC | YAC | Lng | TD | GC | Drp | Drp% | IR | |
| 2049 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 26 | 3.7 | 6.5 | 14 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | - |
| 2050 | 10 | 6 | 14 | 11 | 62 | 6.2 | 5.6 | 44 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 2051 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 13 | 116 | 9.7 | 8.9 | 52 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8.3 | 0 | - |
| Total | 29 | 21 | 43 | 28 | 204 | 7.0 | 7.3 | 110 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 4.7 | 1 | - |
|
| Scouting Report | Potential |
| Inside running game should end up being more than adequate for a college running back. As he adjusts to the college game, his speed will definitely be an advantage. He'll eventually develop into a solid chip blocker. With a little more work in the weight room, he should become very good at slipping tackles. |
|
|
|