| Guy Harper, Defensive Tackle | STAN |
Current/Potential | SACK | STUFF | TAK | HUR | DP |
65/79 | | | | | | Stanford Cardinal |
|
Attributes |
Morale: | Content |
Height: | 6-4 |
Weight: | 309 |
Ideal Wt: | 320 |
Jersey: | 97 |
Age: | 21 |
Year: | Sr |
Status: | OK |
Energy: | 0 |
HS Ranking: | #40 |
Pos Ranking: | #5 DT |
|
Position Ratings |
Pass Rush Moves: | 80 |
Point of Attack: | 99 |
Hands: | 65 |
Tackling: | 84 |
Coverage: | 6 |
Durability: | 39 |
Endurance: | 50 |
Adaptability: | 56 |
|
Athletic Ratings |
Arm Strength: | 8 |
Acceleration: | 35 |
Agility: | 28 |
Speed: | 25 |
Strength: | 83 |
Jumping: | 43 |
Instincts: | 64 |
Aggressiveness: | 41 |
Discipline: | 82 |
Intelligence: | 64 |
Work Ethic: | 21 |
|
Personal Bests |
Sacks: | 2 |
| |
Stuffs: | 1 |
| |
Tackles: | 4 |
| |
Hurries: | 2 |
| |
Interceptions: | 0 |
| |
|
Game Logs |
Week | Opp | Res | Tak | Solo | Ast | Sack | Stuf | Hur | DP | FF | PD | Int | TD | MT | OOP |
|
Defensive Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Tak | Solo | Ast | Sack | Stuf | Hur | DP | FF | PD | MT | OOP | BPA | |
2049 | 11 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | - |
2050 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | - |
2051 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Total | 24 | 15 | 24 | 21 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | - |
|
Turnover Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Ints | Yds | Avg | RecF | Yds | Avg | TD | | | | | | |
2050 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
2051 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total | 24 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Scouting Report | Potential |
| With the hours he puts in on the practice field, he'll someday be outstanding at getting to the quarterback. His emotions won't get out of control but he'll show enough aggression to compete on the D line. Most so called 'experts' think he will have about average speed for a D tackle. Some agility is needed to play on the D line and, over time, he should be ok in that respect. |
|
|