| Tyler Busofsky, Wide Receiver | LOU |
Current/Potential | REC | REC Y | YPC | LNG | TD |
55/63 | | | | | | Louisville Cardinals |
|
Attributes |
Morale: | Content |
Height: | 6-5 |
Weight: | 200 |
Ideal Wt: | 201 |
Jersey: | 86 |
Age: | 25 |
Year: | |
Status: | OK |
Energy: | 0 |
HS Ranking: | #1090 |
Pos Ranking: | #126 WR |
|
Position Ratings |
Hands: | 62 |
Route Running: | 48 |
Running: | 37 |
Run Block: | 1 |
Punt Return: | 91 |
Kick Return: | 75 |
Durability: | 84 |
Endurance: | 62 |
Adaptability: | 64 |
|
Athletic Ratings |
Arm Strength: | 1 |
Acceleration: | 42 |
Agility: | 61 |
Speed: | 56 |
Strength: | 33 |
Jumping: | 53 |
Instincts: | 59 |
Aggressiveness: | 60 |
Discipline: | 94 |
Intelligence: | 83 |
Work Ethic: | 65 |
|
Personal Bests |
Receptions: | 2 |
| |
Receiving yards: | 17 |
| |
Longest catch: | 13 |
| |
Rushing Yards: | 0 |
| |
Touchdowns: | 2 |
| |
|
Game Logs |
Week | Opp | Res | Att | Rec | Yds | YPC | YAC | Lng | TD | GC | Drp | FLost | R Yds | YPC | TD |
|
Receiving Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Att | Rec | Yds | YPG | YPC | YAC | Lng | TD | GC | Drp | Drp% | IR | |
2050 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0.4 | 5.0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - |
2051 | 12 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 17 | 1.4 | 8.5 | 4 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - |
Total | 24 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 22 | 0.9 | 7.3 | 6 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - |
|
Returning Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | KRet | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | PRet | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | FC | | |
2050 | 12 | 0 | 5 | 90 | 18.0 | 23 | 0 | 46 | 644 | 14.0 | 81 | 2 | 3 | - | - |
2051 | 12 | 0 | 15 | 322 | 21.5 | 35 | 0 | 35 | 457 | 13.1 | 66 | 1 | 3 | - | - |
Total | 24 | 0 | 20 | 412 | 20.6 | 35 | 0 | 81 | 1101 | 13.6 | 81 | 3 | 6 | - | - |
|
Scouting Report | Potential |
| He'll eventually have good hands, but probably just average for a wide receiver. When it comes to running routes, he'll probably become respectable but I wouldn't expect much more than that. He'll have some speed; just needs to learn how to use it on the football field. I think he'll get the hang of run blocking but won't ever be much better than average. |
|
|