| Matt Lyons, Running Back | IU |
Current/Potential | RUSH Y | YPC | LNG | REC Y | TD |
49/58 | | | | | | Indiana Hoosiers |
|
Attributes |
Morale: | Content |
Height: | 5-11 |
Weight: | 194 |
Ideal Wt: | 203 |
Jersey: | 29 |
Age: | 19 |
Year: | So |
Status: | OK |
Energy: | 0 |
HS Ranking: | #1384 |
Pos Ranking: | #102 RB |
|
Position Ratings |
Running: | 49 |
Hands: | 53 |
Route Running: | 50 |
Run Block: | 45 |
Punt Return: | 6 |
Kick Return: | 34 |
Durability: | 78 |
Endurance: | 53 |
Adaptability: | 86 |
|
Athletic Ratings |
Arm Strength: | 67 |
Acceleration: | 43 |
Agility: | 69 |
Speed: | 67 |
Strength: | 41 |
Jumping: | 58 |
Instincts: | 44 |
Aggressiveness: | 57 |
Discipline: | 53 |
Intelligence: | 53 |
Work Ethic: | 79 |
|
Personal Bests |
Rushes: | 22 |
| |
Rushing yards: | 147 |
| |
Longest run: | 28 |
| |
Receiving yards: | 16 |
| |
Touchdowns: | 1 |
| |
|
Game Logs |
Week | Opp | Res | Rush | Yds | YPC | YPG | Lng | TD | CR | MH | FLost | Rec | Yds | YPC | TD |
|
Rushing Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Rush | Yds | YPG | YPC | Lng | TD | CR | MH | Fum | FLost | | | |
2051 | 12 | 0 | 137 | 830 | 69.2 | 6.1 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | - | - | - |
Total | 12 | 0 | 137 | 830 | 69.2 | 6.1 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | - | - | - |
|
Receiving Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Att | Rec | Yds | YPG | YPC | YAC | Lng | TD | GC | Drp | Drp% | IR | |
2051 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 5 | 24 | 2.0 | 4.8 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8.3 | 0 | - |
Total | 12 | 0 | 12 | 5 | 24 | 2.0 | 4.8 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8.3 | 0 | - |
|
Returning Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | KRet | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | PRet | Yds | Avg | Lng | TD | FC | | |
2051 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 40 | 20.0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - |
Total | 12 | 0 | 2 | 40 | 20.0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - |
|
Scouting Report | Potential |
| He will eventually become a solid outside runner. Should eventually have enough breakaway speed to compete at this level. He'll eventually develop into a solid chip blocker. His ability to bust tackles will lead to more big gains than the average back. |
|
|