 | Cecil Ortiz, Running Back | CIN |
Current/Potential | RUSH Y | YPC | LNG | REC Y | TD |
58/64 | 53 | 5.3 | 16 | 10 | 2 | Cincinnati Bearcats |
|
Attributes |
Morale: | Frustrated |
Height: | 5-9 |
Weight: | 199 |
Ideal Wt: | 201 |
Jersey: | 33 |
Age: | 22 |
Year: | (So) |
Status: | OK |
Energy: | 0 |
HS Ranking: | #895 |
Pos Ranking: | #64 RB |
|
Position Ratings |
Running: | 53 |
Hands: | 61 |
Route Running: | 53 |
Run Block: | 47 |
Punt Return: | 10 |
Kick Return: | 28 |
Durability: | 70 |
Endurance: | 74 |
Adaptability: | 87 |
|
Athletic Ratings |
Arm Strength: | 51 |
Acceleration: | 62 |
Agility: | 67 |
Speed: | 62 |
Strength: | 37 |
Jumping: | 47 |
Instincts: | 49 |
Aggressiveness: | 48 |
Discipline: | 33 |
Intelligence: | 69 |
Work Ethic: | 84 |
|
Personal Bests |
Rushes: | 9 |
| |
Rushing yards: | 41 |
| |
Longest run: | 16 |
| |
Receiving yards: | 10 |
| |
Touchdowns: | 1 |
| |
|
Game Logs |
Week | Opp | Res | Rush | Yds | YPC | YPG | Lng | TD | CR | MH | FLost | Rec | Yds | YPC | TD |
7 | TROY | W | 1 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
10 | HOU | W | 9 | 41 | 4.56 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 |
Total | - | - | 10 | 53 | 5.3 | 26.5 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 |
|
Rushing Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Rush | Yds | YPG | YPC | Lng | TD | CR | MH | Fum | FLost | | | |
2053 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 53 | 26.5 | 5.3 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
Total | 2 | 0 | 10 | 53 | 26.5 | 5.3 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - |
|
Receiving Statistics |
Year | GP | GS | Att | Rec | Yds | YPG | YPC | YAC | Lng | TD | GC | Drp | Drp% | IR | |
2053 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - |
Total | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | - |
|
Scouting Report | Potential |
| As he learns to make better cuts, his outside running ability will become pretty decent. He'll eventually develop into a solid chip blocker. With a little more muscle, he'll break tackles on a regular basis. His running instincts probably won't turn out to be much better than average. |
|
|